How a Generative AI Pioneer Spots ChatGPT Users (And Why It's Backfiring)

How a Generative AI Pioneer Spots ChatGPT Users (And Why It's Backfiring)

A tech veteran who helped create the first commercial AI content platform in 2010 reveals the telltale signs that give away AI-generated content—and warns it's making people look unprofessional.

Joe Procopio, who holds a patent for early generative AI technology, says detecting ChatGPT-written content has become surprisingly easy. His company, Automated Insights, worked with major clients like Yahoo Fantasy Football and the Associated Press, spending years perfecting algorithms to make AI content sound more human.

The Red Flags That Expose AI Content

Procopio identifies several areas where AI detection is almost instant:

• Sales emails: AI-generated business emails contain obvious templated language and irrelevant context that wastes the recipient's time—worse than traditional spam
• Product reviews: When reviewers use AI without actually testing products, they're essentially writing advertising copy disguised as honest feedback
• Résumés and cover letters: Both recruiters and AI experts can spot machine-generated job applications, defeating their core purpose of showing personal alignment with job requirements

The problem goes beyond detection. Procopio argues that AI content often becomes "word salad"—technically correct language that lacks genuine meaning or personal connection.

Why Personal Connection Still Matters

Despite advancing AI capabilities, Procopio emphasizes that effective communication requires authentic human insight. His original platform focused on "automating insights, not words," helping people understand data rather than replacing meaningful human expression.

He warns against using generative AI as a substitute for personal connection, especially in contexts where authenticity matters most—like personal emails, honest reviews, and professional communications.

The expert's message is clear: while AI has legitimate uses, overreliance on it for human communication often backfires, making users appear lazy or dishonest rather than efficient.

🔗 Read the full article on Inc.com